The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in over 65-year-old men who have inguinal hernias and discuss if pre-operative selective screening of this population is appropriate.

A prospective study on 70 consecutive male patients with an age range of 65–88 years (mean, 74 years) who were referred to a single vascular consultant's out-patient clinic with an inguinal hernia were screened for the presence of an AAA with an ultrasound scan before hernia repair over a period of 3 years.

Two patients were found to have an AAA measuring 3.8 cm and 6.0 cm giving an AAA prevalence of 3% (exact 95% confidence interval = 0–10%).

This study does not demonstrate an increased AAA prevalence in over 65-year-old male patients with inguinal hernias, scanned pre-operatively when compared to screening programmes. Selective screening of this cohort cannot be justified on this evidence.

Acute rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) accounts for 2% of mortality in over 60-year-old men.1 Emergency AAA repair at the time of rupture has a mortality of approximately 75% and elective AAA repair before rupture has a mortality of approximately 5%.2 Screening programmes attempt to detect asymptomatic AAAs in order to repair them electively before rupture occurs.

Age and sex are the only AAA risk factors that are currently used to select a population to be invited for screening. It has been shown that a history of an inguinal hernia repair is a risk factor for AAA and that selectively screening over 65-year-old men with inguinal hernias pre-operatively may detect more AAAs than conventional screening programmes.3

This study aimed to confirm whether pre-operative screening of male patients over the age of 65 years, who have an inguinal hernia, detected a significantly increased prevalence of AAA compared with the results of screening programmes using only age and sex to select their populations.

This study was calculated to require n = 70 to be able to achieve a power of 86% if the expected prevalence = 12% and the control prevalence = 3% (alpha = 0.05, one-tailed, exact method).

Seventy consecutive male patients aged 65 years and older who were referred to the out-patient clinic of a single vascular surgeon with an inguinal hernia between June 2004 and March 2007 underwent ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta in the supine position. The variety of ultrasound machines (one Siemens Sonoline Antares, two Hitachi EUB 8500 and two EUB 5500) and ultrasonographers was not limited for this study.

The age range of the study population was 65–88 years (mean, 74 years; mode, 66 years; median, 73 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 73–75). Ultrasound scan results were < 2.5 cm in any transverse section in 64 cases (91%), ectatic (2.5–3 cm in any transverse section) in 3 cases (4%), aneurysmal (≥ 3 cm in any transverse section or dilated ≥ 50% than the proximal aorta) in two cases that measured 3.8 cm and 6.0 cm (3%) and occluded in one case (1.4%). This gives an AAA prevalence of 3% (normal 95% CI, −1 to 7%, exact 95% CI, 0–10%).

Hernia types were bilateral inguinal (6), right inguinal (40), left inguinal (22), and side not recorded (2). Three cases had a para-umbilical hernia in addition to a single inguinal hernia (all right-sided), one case had a para-umbilical hernia in addition to bilateral inguinal hernias. No patient had a previous ultrasound scan for AAA.

A chi-squared test comparing the prevalence of AAA found in this study with that found in the study by Pleumeekers et al.3 (4.98 1df; P = 0.026) signifies that the distributions are significantly different. Chi-squared tests comparing the prevalence of AAA found in this study and that found in four screening programmes2023 that only used age and sex to identify their populations (1.57 1df; P = 0.21: 0.61 1df; P = 0.43: 2.27 1df; P = 0.13; and 1.71 1df; P = 0.19, respectively) signify that the distributions are insignificantly different.

Planned UK AAA screening programmes have inclusion criteria that are based solely on the age and sex of the patient (over 65-year-old men).4,5 Other known risk factors of AAA are smoking,6 hypertension7,8 and peripheral vascular disease,9 but screening programmes do not plan to use these factors to select a population to be invited to screening.

Many research studies in the past have found that AAAs are a risk factor for hernias.1017 If the reverse association were true (i.e. if hernias were a risk factor for AAAs), then the presence of a hernia could be used to select higher risk patients and, therefore, increase the effectiveness of a screening programme.

Pleumeekers et al.3 demonstrated that in a cohort of male patients aged over 55 years, with a history of inguinal hernia repair in the past, there was a significantly increased risk of AAA of 12.2% (95% CI, 7.0–17.4) compared to 3.7% (95% CI, 2.8–4.6) in those without a history of inguinal hernia repair. The incidence of AAA in UK screening programmes is reported to be between 4.1–7.7%.1823 Pleumeekers et al.3 suggested that pre-operative screening of male patients > 55 years of age with inguinal hernias may be of value.

We examined a cohort of over 65-year-old male patients, who were referred with an inguinal hernia, with an ultra-sound scan of the abdomen. The prevalence of AAA in our study population was 3% with a normal 95% CI of −1 to 7% and exact 95% CI of 0–10%. Statistical analysis reveals that our results are significantly different to those of Pleumeekers et al.,3 but not significantly different to those from screening programmes; it also reveals that this study has sufficient power to make a type 2 error unlikely.

This study has not shown that AAA is significantly more common in patients with an inguinal hernia than that reported in screening programmes which select patients purely on the basis of being male and aged over 65 years.

This is clinically important, because it reduces uncertainty for clinicians and patients who have to decide whether or not to have an ultrasound scan of the abdominal aorta to exclude a AAA before repair of an inguinal hernia in male patients over the age of 65 years.

Our study is different to the study performed by Pleumeekers et al.3 because we did not exclude patients with inguinal hernias from the control group and we did not limit the variety of ultrasound machines and ultrasonographers used. Our definition of an aneurysm is ≥ 3 cm which is an accepted definition of an abdominal aortic aneurysm;2021,2425 applying the definition of an aneurysm used by Pleumeekers et al.3 of ≥ 3.5 cm would not change our results because the two aortas found to measure more than 3 cm were 3.8 cm and 6 cm and would be included in both definitions.

The study by Pleumeekers et al.3 may be questioned for allowing the study population to select themselves for the study, lack of blinding, different ultrasound equipment and ultrasonographer for the study and control groups, a significant difference in the AAA risk factor profile of the study and control groups (age, blood pressure and intermittent claudication) and the temporal difference between the inguinal hernia repair and performing the diagnostic test for a AAA. This may have lead to selection, performance and observation bias and confounding.

Our study identified three ectatic aortas that can potentially enlarge.2426 If all the ectatic aortas in our study became aneurysms then our results would not be significantly different to the results of Pleumeekers et al.3 (chi-squared test 1.29 1df; P = 0.26); however, this may take more than 10 years.27 It may be hypothesised that inguinal hernias make the development of an AAA more likely in the future.

Selectively screening for AAA pre-operatively in over 65-year-old men with an inguinal hernia is of no greater value than screening over 65-year-old men regardless of the presence of an inguinal hernia.

The authors thank Peter Nightingale, Statistician, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust for his assistance during this study.

1. Law M. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br Med Bull 1998; 54: 90313. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
2. Gorski Y, Ricotta JJ. Weighing risks in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Best repaired in an elective, not an emergency, procedure. Postgrad Med J 1999; 106: 69707580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
3. Pleumeekers HJCM, de Gruijl A, Hofman A, van Beek AJ, Hoes AW. Prevalence of aortic aneurysm in men with a history of inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 11558. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
4. National Screening Committee Policy position February 2006, subject to review, on AAA screening for men aged 65 by ultrasound examination of the abdomen. <>. Google Scholar
5. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TMScott RA, et alMulticentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 15319. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
6. Auerbach O, Garfinkel L. Atherosclerosis and aneurysm of aorta in relation to smoking habits and age. Chest 1980; 78: 8059. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
7. Grimshaw GM, Thompson JM, Harner M. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with hypertension in an urban population. J Med Screen 1994; 1: 2268. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
8. Williams IM, Hughes OD, Townsend E, Winter RK, Lewis MH. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a hypertensive population. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 78: 5014. MedlineGoogle Scholar
9. Allardice JT, Allwright GJ, Wafula MC, Wyatt AP. High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in men with peripheral vascular disease: screening by ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 2402. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
10. Lehnert B, Wadouh F. High coincidence of inguinal hernias and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1992; 6: 1347. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
11. Cannon DJ, Casteel L, Read RC. Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Leriche's syndrome, inguinal herniation, and smoking. Arch Surg 1984; 119: 3879. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
12. Papadimitriou D, Pitoulias G, Papaziogas B, Koutsias S, Vretzakis GArgiriadou H, et al. Incidence of abdominal wall hernias in patients undergoing aortic surgery for aneurysm or occlusive disease. Vasa 2002; 31: 1114. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
13. Adye B, Luna G. Incidence of abdominal wall hernia in aortic surgery. Am J Surg 1998; 175: 4002. MedlineGoogle Scholar
14. Raffetto JD, Cheung Y, Fisher JB, Cantelmo NL, Watkins MTLamorte WW, et al. Incision and abdominal wall hernias in patients with aneurysm or occlusive aortic disease. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 11504. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
15. Hall KA, Peters B, Smyth SH, Warneke JA, Rappaport WDPutnam CW, et al. Abdominal wall hernias in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysmal versus aortoiliac occlusive disease. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 5726. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
16. Musella M, Milone F, Chello M, Angelini P, Jovino R. Magnetic resonance imaging and abdominal wall hernias in aortic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193: 3925. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
17. Takagi H, Sugimoto M, Kato T, Matsuno Y, Umemoto T. Postoperative incision hernia in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortoiliac occlusive disease: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 17781. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
18. Laws C, Eastman J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm by general practitioners and practice-based ultrasonographers. J Med Screen 2006; 13: 1601. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
19. Scott RAP, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 106670. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
20. Holdsworth JD. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Northumberland. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 7102. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
21. Kyriakides C, Byrne J, Green S, Hulton NR. Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82: 5963. MedlineGoogle Scholar
22. Scott RA, Vardulaki KA, Walker NM, Day NE, Duffy SW, Ashton HA. The long-term benefits of a single scan for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at age 65. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21: 53540. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
23. Khoo DE, Ashton H, Scott RA. Is screening once at age 65 an effective method for detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Med Screen 1994; 1: 2235. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
24. Basnyat PS, Aiono S, Warsi AA, Magee TR, Galland RB, Lewis MH. Natural history of the ectatic aorta. Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 11: 2736. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
25. d'Audiffret A, Santilli S, Tretinyak A, Roethle S. Fate of the ectatic infrarenal aorta: expansion rates and outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 16: 5346. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
26. Cronenwett JL, Sargent SK, Wall MH, Hawkes ML, Freeman DHDain BJ, et al. Variables that affect the expansion rate and outcome of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1990; 11: 2608. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
27. Wright DM, O'Dwyer PJ. Prevalence of aortic aneurysm in men with a history of inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1234. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar

Article Metrics

Crossref 10
About article usage data:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean euismod bibendum laoreet. Proin gravida dolor sit amet lacus accumsan et viverra justo commodo. Proin sodales pulvinar tempor. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.

Bookmark and share